Why “GOOG” is going to be successful in China?

1. Google is bringing its U.S. acquising model into Chinese practice
2. Google is a tool of first adapters even in China
3. It dominates Chinese cross-site advertising market
4. It is a huge employer of best colleges
5. Most forums/bbs have links to Google or Firefox
6. It was able to build a binding relationship with Tsinghua University - a sign of approval from top intellectual and political circles
7. Google changed its name to Gu Gu - Let’s see yahoo or microsoft follow its path..

that’s it for today..

Trackbacks/Pings: [Trackback URL]
Filed under: China Market

4 Responses to “Why “GOOG” is going to be successful in China?”

1. Gemme, on February 11th, 2007 at 2:46 pm Said:

   Nice to see a new blog focusing on the China Internet Market. Some of the points on the list make sense, but the last one, I’m afraid, doesn’t.

   Changing their name has harmed them more than they could have envisioned. The guy responsible for this campaign recently quit and the majority of the Chinese users felt it was a stupid move.

   Yahoo won’t follow suit for the reason of localization as they are already a part of Alibaba and getting adjusted/incorporated till at one point the Yahoo brand will be gone I’m afraid.

   MSN won’t change their name as there is no reason and I’m sure they watched the Guge drama unfold.

   Google hopefully will make at some point a dent in the current Baidu rule but it will take some time.

2. Cialis., on November 1st, 2007 at 9:28 am Said:

   Cialis online….

   Asprin and cialis. Cialis st. Cialis….

3. madmilker, on November 7th, 2007 at 2:10 am Said:

   This is a time bomb. Tick, tick……Tick

   From RGEmonitor blog:

   Look at the info Citigroup just filed with the SEC today: they have $135 BILLION in LEVEL 3 ASSETS.

   I have a neat idea.

   Why don’t we take every single major financial institution out there and then divide their total Level 3 assets by their equity capital base and make comparisons?

   This will give us a better idea as to which of them may really remain solvent at the end of the day. Shall we?

   Let’s have a look at Citigroup. Their equity base is $128 billion. Therefore, their Level 3 assets to equity ratio: 105%

   How about Goldman Sachs? Level 3 assets are $72 billion, equity base is $39 billion. Their Level 3 assets to equity ratio is 185%.

   Morgan Stanley: $88 billion in Level 3, equity base is $35 billion. Ratio: 251% (WOW!)

   Bear Stearns: $20 billion in Level 3, equity base is $13 billion. Ratio: 154%

   Lehman Brothers: $35 billion in Level 3, $22 billion in equity. Ratio: 159%

   Merrill Lynch: $16 billion in Level 3, $42 billion in equity. Ratio: 38%

   Here is the Level 3 assets to equity ratio summary:

   Citigroup 105%

   Goldman Sachs 185%

   Morgan Stanley 251%

   Bear Stearns 154%

   Lehman Brothers 159%

   Merrill Lynch 38%

   This becomes very interesting now, doesn’t it?

   Looks to me like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are by far in the WORST situation among the investment banks.

   And yet the media is focusing all of their attention on Merrill Lynch—which actually has by far THE LEAST EXPOSURE of all of them. What a joke.

   As I said before, the media should stop diverting attention and trying to make this into a “Merrill-specific” problem.

   All of the investment banks are in deep trouble. These numbers should make that extremely evident. The deception must be exposed.

   Written by Bernard on 2007-11-05 11:33:55

4. Pharmacy price for adderall xr 20mg 30 capsules., on May 1st, 2008 at 6:34 pm Said:

   Pictures of adderall xr….

   Adderall. No prescription adderall….

Leave a Reply